City of
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
Present: Commissioners Amarotico, Eggers, Gardiner, Lewis, Rosenthal; Director Robertson; Superintendent Gies; Superintendent Teige; City Council Liaison Amarotico
Absent: None
Gardiner called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM at Council Chambers, 1175
Study Session – February 24, 2005
MOTION Lewis moved to approve the minutes as written. Rosenthal seconded the motion.
The vote was: 5 yes – 0 no
Regular Meeting – February 28, 2005 Under Unfinished Business item “Baseball Field Lights,” Eggers asked that the minutes be clarified to state: “so they [the commission] could determine where baseball lights would fall in terms of priorities.” Under New Business item “RFP Award,” Eggers requested that the sentence under “Discussion Among Commissioners” be changed to read: “Commissioners debated the pros and cons of the strengths and weaknesses of the proposals.” Under New Business item “Director’s Evaluation Report,” Eggers asked that the motion read: “in accordance with the contractual provision.”
MOTION Rosenthal moved to approve the minutes as corrected. Eggers seconded the motion.
The vote was: 5 yes – 0 no
Special Meeting – March 14, 2005
MOTION Eggers moved to approve the minutes as written. Rosenthal seconded the motion.
The vote was: 5 yes – 0 no
Study Session – March 14, 2005
MOTION Lewis moved to approve the minutes as written. Rosenthal seconded the motion.
The vote was: 5 yes – 0 no
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Open Forum
Melissa Mitchell-Hooge, 271 High Street, of the Save Our Schools and Playgrounds committee, distributed packets to commissioners consisting of: historical photos of Lincoln Elementary School; results from a survey conducted in Ashland [regarding the preservation of Lincoln School as a neighborhood park]; and potential long-term funding options for retaining both Lincoln and Briscoe School playgrounds as neighborhood parks.
Commissioners agreed to discuss the New Business item “Little League Request” before Unfinished Business.
NEW BUSINESS
Gies reported that Ashland Little League requested the installation of a permanent batting cage facility at Hunter Park in place of the temporary cages installed by Parks staff each year. He stated that the group requested the use of the site only, and that they were prepared to fund the project and to provide all necessary labor. He added that the temporary cages get vandalized nearly every year, and a permanent facility might alleviate the problem.
Jack Opgenorth,
Discussion Among Commissioners
Commissioners asked how the facility would be constructed and were informed that it would be made from cinder block and roofed with composition shingles. A commissioner expressed interest in using natural lighting instead of artificial lighting while another commissioner asked about the cost of the project and was told that $35,000 was budgeted for it, with the hope that donated services might lower the cost. Commissioners thanked the guests for their proposal and agreed to evaluate the project and discuss it at a future meeting.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
BUDGET NARRATIVE
Robertson outlined the budget narrative document enclosed in the commission packets, stating that the City’s intent for the document was to develop measurable performance goals, with an annual review to generate performance goals for the upcoming budget year. He asked for input from the commission on the Parks pages, which included sections on Parks, Recreation, Golf, Capital Improvement Fund, and the Youth Activities Levy. He asked whether commissioners wished to include goals for the new fiscal year.
Discussion Among Commissioners
Commissioners asked a number of clarifying questions about specific items within the document and agreed that inclusion of the goals would be appropriate. They read and scanned through the document, noting their comments, questions, and concerns and instructing staff to modify and edit the document. Staff agreed to submit the revised document to the Finance Department for inclusion in the City’s overall budget book.
CAPITAL BUDGET DISCUSSION
Robertson reminded the commission that, at the conclusion of the March 14 study session, staff was directed to develop an itemized list of potential capital improvement projects and necessary equipment purchases. The projects and equipment identified totaled $647,100, which included funds to remodel facilities, replace playground equipment, possibly develop Phase I of Vogel and / or
Discussion Among Commissioners
Eggers advocated for land acquisition and development, noting the importance of shifting budget funds to accommodate increasingly high land prices. Staff agreed to itemize “General Park Improvements,” to shift money into park development / acquisition, and to prepare for further discussion at the April study session.
5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Robertson directed commissioners’ attention to the packet memo regarding potential 2002-2006 long-term capital improvement projects. He requested that staff be given direction on prioritizing projects by importance or by proposed year of completion.
Discussion Among Commissioners
Commissioners directed staff to prioritize projects by proposed year of completion. Staff encouraged commissioners to suggest additional projects as appropriate. Rosenthal asked for the inclusion of funding for a parking lot at the driving range at Oak Knoll Golf Course [which was listed as a goal following a 2003 Golf Course Subcommittee meeting].
NEW BUSINESS
RESERVOIR PARKING
Robertson reported that the Public Works Department will replace a waterline from the Reeder Reservoir through a portion of the swimming reservoir [and its associated parking area] in the spring and summer of 2005. Following completion of the project, Public Works will reinstall parking spaces to either current standards or improved standards in the form of additional spaces at the reservoir. Since current parking spaces are inadequate on busy days at the reservoir, he questioned whether it would be appropriate to ask Public Works for additional parking spaces upon completion of the project.
Discussion Among Commissioners
Eggers expressed concern about the riparian vegetation near the reservoir and suggested the possibility of closing down parking on the creek side. When asked about the deadline for requesting additional parking spaces at the reservoir, staff reported that the project will be completed in early July and Public Works needs an answer soon.
Staff was directed to ask Public Works to create additional parking spaces near the reservoir, but not on the side bordering the creek.
SUB-COMMITTEE and STAFF REPORTS
Commissioners read two pieces of correspondence from members of the public and directed staff to research them and refer them to appropriate staff members, commissions, or departments.
ITEMS FROM COMMISSIONERS
Eggers asked staff to schedule a meeting in the near future to discuss pending requests for plaques, signs, and memorials within the parks system.
UPCOMING MEETING DATE(S) and PROPOSED AGENDA ITEMS
· Study session set for April 18 at 7:00 PM –
· Regular meeting set for April 25 at 7:00 PM – Council Chambers, 1175
ADJOURNMENT – By consensus, with no further business, Gardiner adjourned the meeting at 9:25 PM.
Respectfully submitted, Susan Dyssegard,