ASHLAND HISTORIC COMMISSION
Minutes
Community Development/Engineering Services Building – 51 Winburn Way – Siskiyou Room
Historic Commissioners Present: Dale Shostrom, Tom Giordano, Alex Krach, Terry Skibby, Henry Baker, Keith Swink, Sam Whitford, Rob Saladoff,
Absent Commission Members: ,
Council Liaison: Alice Hardesty, absent
High School Liaison: None Appointed
SOU Liaison: None Appointed
Staff Present: David Stalheim, Planning Director, Maria Harris, Senior Planner; Billie Boswell, Administration
CALL TO ORDER
At 7:08 pm, Chairman Dale Shostrom called the Historic Commission meeting to order.
Mr. Krach made a motion to approve the minutes and it was seconded by Mr. Whitford. The motion passed unanimously by the commissioners present. Mr. Giordano abstained as he was absent from the meeting.
PUBLIC FORUM: No speakers
NEW BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARING
Planning Action 2006-01999
Conditional Use Permit and Site Review
Applicant:
Chairman Shostrom read the description of the proposed project and confirmed there were no conflict of interest or exparte contacts.
Ms. Harris introduced David Stalheim, the new Planning Director.
Ms. Harris explained the applicant had made significant changes to the proposal, addressing the Commission’s concerns regarding bulk and scale and providing more design details. Chairman Shostrom asked about the reference in the staff report to the window orientation. Ms. Harris said the design standards called out a “vertical” orientation.
Mark McKechnie, architect, reviewed all the changes that were made including raising the parapet to meet code, a railing added to the rear parapet to match the railing below. He also described the materials and finishes.
Mr. Giordano suggested the center bar in the windows be raised up. Mr. Sandler said they could also elongate the windows to address the vertical orientation issue. Chairman Shostrom did not feel the bead-board exterior siding on the parapet was appropriate and suggested it be changed to stucco to match the rest of the exterior finish. Bead-board was acceptable on the interior portion of the space.
There being no one in the audience wishing to speak, Chairman Shostrom closed the public meeting.
The Commissioners liked the changes that had been made to the plan and felt it protected the historic design of the original building.
With a motion by Chairman Shostrom and a second by Mr. Skibby, the Historic Commission unanimously recommended approval of the planning action for Site Review and a Conditional Use Permit with the following recommendations:
Site Review and Conditional Use Permit for ARU
Jane &
Since the applicants were not present and no one in the audience wished to speak on this project, Chairman Shostrom suggested this action be heard after Planning Action #2006-02354. The other Commissioners agreed.
Planning Action 2006-02354
Site Review, Variance and Exception to the Street Standards for new Office Building
Raymond J. Kistler Architecture
Chairman Shostrom read the description of the project and asked if there were any conflicts of interest. Mr. Giordano said he had a conflict of interest because he had worked on the project and recused himself and left the meeting.
Staff handed out additional copies of plans (pages 3.2, 7.1 & 7.2) that had inadvertently been left out of the packet. Copies of the Pre-Application recommendations were also distributed as requested by Chairman Shostrom.
Ms. Harris reviewed the Staff Report with the Commissioners. She stated the variance to the front setback of 20 feet to 10 feet seemed reasonable because of other neighboring setbacks. However, there was concern that a signal planned for Wimer and
There being no further questions of staff, Raymond Kistler, owner and architect, reviewed the changes he had made to the design as a result of the preliminary review with the Historic Commission several months before. He stated that it was confusing to determine if the Historic Commission wanted the design to look more commercial/industrial or residential in nature in order to be compatible with the mixed uses in the neighborhood.
Mr. Skibby pointed out that the plans show a significant decrease in the size and number of windows resulting in more mass and bulk on the rear and side elevations. Mr. Kistler said this change was to comply with building codes. There was discussion on various options to breakup the flat box look of the sides and rear and large roof mass as seen from the front. Chairman Shostrom and Mr. Whitford expressed concern over the support braces on the front elevation not being compatible. Mr. Swink felt there was too much unpainted galvanized metal on the roof and exterior walls. Suggestions were made to painting or use of alternative materials.
Chairman Shostrom made a motion, seconded by Mr. Swink, to recommend the application be continued because the Historic Commission has concerns with the proposal meeting the Historic District Design Standards of the Site Design and Use Standards for Massing (IV-C-3), Roof Shapes (IV-C-5) and Rhythm of Openings (IV-C-6). Also, the Commission has concerns with regard to the compatibility of exterior materials with the surrounding area. Specific recommendations are following.
The motion carried unanimously.
The Historic Commissioners discussed the applicant’s concerns regarding the Commission’s generally positive review at the Pre-Application stage versus the more detailed review of the revised plans submitted for this review. Although the applicant said there were few changes made, it was the consensus of the Commissioners that the changes were significant and much more detailed regarding materials than those presented at the pre-application review.
Planning Action 2006-02350
Site Review and Conditional Use Permit for ARU
Jane &
Chairman Shostrom read the description of the proposed project and confirmed there were no conflict of interest or exparte contacts.
Ms. Harris explained that the 500 square foot building under consideration for the Accessory Residential Unit is existing and no changes are proposed for the exterior.
The applicant was not present. There was no one in the audience wishing to speak.
Mr. Whitford made a motion to recommend approval and it was seconded by Mr. Baker. The motion passed unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
January 4th |
Terry, Keith, Tom |
January 11th |
Terry, Henry, Dale |
January 18th |
Terry, Alex, Dale |
January 25th |
Terry, Tom, Sam |
February 1st |
Terry, Sam, Tom |
February 8th |
Terry, Keith, Rob |
B. PROJECT ASSIGNMENTS FOR PLANNING ACTIONS
PA #2000-120 |
485 “A” Street (Steve Hoxmeier) |
Shostrom |
PA #2004-102 |
832 “A” Street (Ilene Rubenstein) |
Saladoff |
PA #2004-138 |
234 Vista St (Sid & Karen DeBoer) |
Saladoff |
PA #2004-154 |
|
Krach |
PA-#2004-160 |
685 A Street (William Reeves) |
Swink |
PL#2005-01226 |
820 “C” Street (Randy & Helen Ellison) |
Shostrom |
PL#2005-01674 |
11 First Street (Ron Yamaoka) |
Skibby |
PL#2005-02105 |
145 East Main St (Urban Development Services/SERA Arch) |
Giordano/Baker |
PL#2005-01307 |
125 Sherman Street (Russ Dale) |
Shostrom |
PL#2006-00057 |
247 Third Street (Marc Valens & Anne Golden) |
Saladoff |
PA#2006-00441 |
160 Nob Hill (ARU-Dan Heller & Don Sever) |
Whitford |
PA#2006-00453 |
175 North Main (First Methodist Church Remodel) |
Swink |
PA#2006-00875 |
520 Fairview Street (Stewart Ward-Porch) |
Swink |
PA#2006-00877 |
A Street between 5th & 6th Streets (Tax Lot 6507 – Jerry Kenefick) |
Krach |
PA#2006-00612 |
160 Helman (Siskiyou LLC & James Batzer-Commercial Buidlings) |
Shostrom/Giordano |
PA#2006-01959 |
144 |
Whitford |
PA#2006-01999 |
|
Krach |
C. Letter to
D. National Historic Preservation Week 2007 – “Preservation Works!” – Decision was made to host this year’s Preservation Week May 13th – 19th. Ms. Boswell said the nomination form would be placed in the City Newsletter to be sent with the February utility bills.
E. Lithia Springs National Register Nomination – No report
F. Single Family Residential Design Standards – No report
G. Co-Sponsorship with Conservation Commission for Fall Workshop – No report
DISCUSSION ITEMS - None
NEW BUSINESS – None
COMMISSION ITEMS
ANNOUNCEMENTS
The next Historic Commission meeting will be on February 7, 2007 at 7:00 pm in the Siskiyou Room.
With a motion by Chairman Shostrom and a second by Mr. Whitford, it was the unanimous decision of the Commission to adjourn the meeting at 10:20 p.m.