ASHLAND HISTORIC COMMISSION
Minutes
Community Development/Engineering Services Building – 51 Winburn Way –
Siskiyou Room
Historic Commissioners Present: Dale Shostrom, Keith Swink, Tom Giordano, Alex Krach, Rob
Saladoff, Terry Skibby, Jay Leighton and Henry Baker
Absent Members: Sam Whitford
Council Liaison: John Morrison (absent)
High School Liaison: None
Appointed
SOU Liaison: None Appointed
Staff Present: Maria Harris,
Associate Planner, Billie Boswell, Administration
CALL
TO ORDER
At 7:05 p.m., Chairman Dale Shostrom called the meeting to
order.
Chairman Shostrom introduced and welcomed new commissioner,
Henry Baker.
Giordano
moved to approve the September 8, 2004 minutes as revised. With a second by
Leighton, the motion was approved with all voting aye.
PUBLIC
HEARINGS
Planning
Action 2004-127
Conditional
Use Permit
Applicant:
Matt Stormont, New Heights Design
Owner:
Geoff Clayton
108
Seventh Street
Most members had site visits but no ex-parte contact. There was no conflict of interest issues.
Maria Harris explained that the Conditional Use Permit was
for a cantilevered second story balcony to be built on the south side of a
proposed second story addition to an existing accessory building. The building is located on the south
property line and is considered non-conforming because it does not meet the
required side yard setback of ten feet along a public street. The proposed balcony would be four feet, two
inches from the side property line adjacent to C Street. Harris said Staff believes the addition of
the balcony would not create a greater adverse impact on the livability of the
neighborhood and would be architecturally compatible with the mix of building
types and sizes.
The applicant, Matt Stormont, said the owner wanted to use
the second story addition as an artist’s studio and wished to have the balcony
on the south side as an exterior sitting area with a view. Putting the balcony on the north side would
interfere with the existing tree and afford no view.
There being no one in the audience, the public meeting was
closed.
Discussion by the commission members followed regarding the
cantilevered design of the balcony and the tall, boxy nature of the addition.
They felt both the addition and the balcony eliminated the existing historical
significance of the accessory structure and did not add any new design features
to enhance the historical compatibility of the structure with those currently
on the property and in the neighborhood.
The public meeting was reopened and Giordano asked Stormont
if he agreed to a continuance. Stormont said that he did agree to a continuance
and would talk to the owner about the suggested changes to amend the design to
make it more in scale and character with the existing neighborhood. asked the applicant's rep if he
agreed to a continuance and he said that he did agree to a continuance AND
would talk to the owner about the suggested changes.
The public meeting was again closed.
Giordano moved to recommend a continuance of the
application to the November meeting in order for the applicant and owner to
consider the following design suggestions:
1.
Consider a one and a half story design for the
addition to eliminate tall, boxy, top-heavy appearance.
2.
Vault interior space to maintain interior volume.
3.
Leave façade of the original building intact,
retaining existing historical features.
4.
Inset balcony to eliminate cantilever design or
move to north side of structure.
5.
Use a steeper roof pitch more compatible with the
main house.
6.
Enlarge windows to be more in scale with size of
the building.
7.
Define the west main entry with roof or porch
elements.
8.
Decrease the tall, boxy shape by expanding the
eaves, including a more substantial belly-band and delineating the siding and
trim on new versus old. Consider
restoration of the existing siding.
Swink seconded the motion and it passed
unanimously.
ITEMS
NOT ON AGENDA
The commissioners discussed
section 18.68.090 of the Ashland Municipal Code that states, “A non-conforming
structure may be enlarged, reconstructed or structurally altered if its
footprint is not changed in size or shape.”
The commission suggested staff consider revising the section to
eliminate reference to “enlarge” which encourages the tall, boxy type of
design.
OLD
BUSINESS
October 7th |
Skibby, Swink,
Saladoff |
October 14th |
Skibby, Saladoff,
Baker |
October 21st
|
Skibby, Giordano,
Swink |
October 28th
|
Skibby, Krach,
Whitford |
November 4th |
Skibby, Leighton,
Shostrom |
Project
Assignments for Planning Actions
PA #2000-120 |
485 “A” Street (Steve Hoxmeier) |
Shostrom |
PA #2002-100 |
142 East Main Street (Earthly Goods) |
Leighton |
PA #2003-005 |
35 S. Second Street (Winchester Inn) |
Krippaehne |
PA #2003-092 |
124 Alida Street (Kirt Meyer and
Vadim Agakhanov) |
Krippaehne |
PA #2004-017 |
364 Hargadine Street (Ken Kolar) |
Krach |
PA #2004-026 |
81 Central Avenue (Wes & Lucinda
Vail) |
Giordano |
PA #2004-018 |
322 Pioneer Street (Al & Sandra
Carlson) |
Swink |
PA #2004-043 |
246 Catalina Drive (Dr. William
Rodden) |
Krach |
PA #2004-100 |
80 Wimer (Tom & Kathy Petersen) |
Whitford |
PA #2004-102 |
832 “A” Street (Ilene Rubenstein) |
Saladoff |
PA #2004-110 |
150 Church St (Robert M. Saladoff) |
Whitford |
PA #2004-115 |
724 Iowa St (Dave and Jamie Kaufman) |
Swink |
Co-Sponsorship with Conservation Commission for Fall
Workshop – Sub-Committee of Saladoff, Swink, and Shostrom
formed. Saladoff agreed to contact Joanne
Krippaehne to arrange a meeting later in November.
Possible National Register Nomination for Lithia Springs
Property – Memo needed from Planning Director determining the
eligibility of the Gun Club retaining their use of the property if it is listed
on the National Historical Register.
Skibby asked for a packet of information on Lithia Springs be put
together for Baker. Leighton said she
had the information and could provide it.
Memo to Council Regarding Authorization for Multiple Listing
Survey for National Register of Historic Places —
Shostrom suggested inviting Kay Attwood, George Kramer
and/or Scott Clay in November to discuss which properties should be considered
and the feasibility in pursuing the project.
Brown Bag Lunch Ideas – Old House Fair –
Leighton will follow up.
Single Family Residential Design Standards – A
sub-committee may need to be appointed to start developing standards. Postponed
until November.
COMMISSION ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA
Krach reviewed mail and asked the Commission to consider
renewing their membership with the National Historic Trust and the Historic
Preservation League of Oregon.
Consensus was to approve both renewals.
Krach said the Mayor would approve any SOU student candidate
the Commission selected to be appointed to serve as a non-voting Historic
Commission member. Consensus was to move forward to identify candidates to
begin in January.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
The next Historic Commission meeting will be on November 3,
2004 at 7:00 pm in the Siskiyou Room.
With a motion by Shostrom and second by Leighton, it was the
unanimous decision of the Commission to adjourn the meeting at 9:00 p.m.