AFN Financial Narrative: AFN's cash position is the most important financial comparison we have. It represents the net relationship between resources and requirements and helps us to monitor how AFN is doing. As of December 31 our cash balance had decreased to $552,000 from the $640,000 amount provided by the debt refinancing done in August. The key reasons for this reduction are:
| • |
Total revenues are below the original budget (which included projections from the Navigant study). |
| • |
Expenses remain high with CATV programming costs higher than anticipated and the City, because of our existing bandwidth contract, was unable to implement a fractional DS3 as soon as hoped resulting in higher costs. |
It is important to know that cash flow variations are normal (the balance increased to $593,000 in January) however, the City goal is to build cash each month and year to meet debt service requirements. Even though cash rebounded in January and the newly adopted rates will impact cash by March, the short and long-term trends for cash are of concern.
AFN has seen some promising changes in specific revenues and expenses but not enough to offset the two items mentioned above. Examples of promising changes are:
| 1. |
Cable modem revenue exceeds budgeted amounts |
| 2. |
A new contract for service to Ashland Community Hospital has been negotiated |
| 3. |
Staffing costs are below expectations |
| 4. |
A change in bandwidth costs will soon be realized |
| 5. |
Capital outlay for the year is expected to be light |
Any budget comparison should include the changes to revenues and expenses precipitated by the refinancing which included monies to cover issuance costs and an amount to aid in the first debt payment. The following table compares the original budget, the January Supplemental Budget done for the August bond issue and resultant impact (Revised). Actual represents revenues and expenses to date as of December 31:
|
Resources |
Adopted |
Sup. Budget |
Revised |
Actual |
Actual to Revised |
Balance |
| Revenues |
2,894,752 |
|
2,894,752 |
1,792,199 |
44.6% |
1,602,553 |
| Bond Proceeds |
15,000,000 |
500,000 |
15,500,000 |
15,500,000 |
100.0% |
0 |
|
|
| -----Total |
17,894,752 |
500,000 |
18,394,752 |
16,792,199 |
91.3% |
1,602,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Promotions |
222,032 |
|
222,032 |
42,527 |
19.2% |
179,505 |
| Operations |
2,415,165 |
234,636 |
2,649,801 |
1,504,514 |
56.8% |
1,145,287 |
| Debt |
14,402,000 |
208,720 |
14,610,720 |
14,610,720 |
100.0% |
0 |
| Contingency |
75,000 |
56,644 |
131,644 |
0 |
N/A |
131,644 |
|
|
| -----Total |
17,114,197 |
500,000 |
17,614,197 |
16,157,761 |
91.7% |
1,456,436 |
|
|
| Excess |
780,555 |
|
780,555 |
634,438 |
81.3% |
146,117 |
Please note:
| • |
After all resources and requirements (including carry forward and refinancing) the original budget projected an Ending Fund Balance of $954,723. |
| • |
However, AFN started the year with $111,532 less carry over than anticipated, and this will reduce the Ending Fund Balance to $843,191. |
| • |
Operational expenses for the first six months of the year were $1,300,515 ($16,157,761 minus Debt Service and Bond issuance costs) while operational revenue was $1,292,199, for a net loss of $8,317. |
| • |
Additional shortfalls in revenue will likely reduce the $843,191 even further. |
Also:
| • |
AFN cash balance was $6,848 at July 1, 2004; cash proceeds from refinancing were $640,000 in August and the balance at December 31, 2004, was $551,743. |
| • |
Predicted revenues compared to expenses estimate a shortfall of $163,000 in cash set aside for the debt service amount of $802,021due in July. |
During FY 2004-05, the goal was to closely monitor activities and try and manage expenditures to adhere to projections included in the pro forma and budget. While the majority of Navigant initiatives have been implemented in some form, staff plans to implement the remaining ones during the January-March, 2005 quarter and to re-engineer and re-offer some of the early initiatives during this time frame.
The rate increase approved by the Council in January takes effect in February 2005. This should improve cash flow by $85,000 during the February-June period. Also planned is replacing one of our two main internet connections (bandwidth) with a new contract. The old contract expired in December and was costing about $12,000 per month. The new provider will be able to provide equivalent service for about $4,500 per month. Four months of net savings at $7,500 should reduce costs by about $30,000 for the remainder of this year and reduce annual costs in future years by over $90,000. We expect to further reduce future bandwidth costs in August as another Internet connection contract expires and related expenses can be reduced under a new contract.
Staff has modeled the remainder of the year in both the revenue and expense sides of AFN's budget and it looks like projected revenue will be about $2,617,380. We project costs of about $2,805,759 which is a short fall of about $188,379.
One of the Council highest priority goals from the recent goal setting was to determine a way to provide alternative income to AFN to ensure its financial viability. Because of the upcoming and future debt service payments we need to consider alternate income and /or subsidies to meet our commitments.
One source of revenue could be to provide a General Fund subsidy equivalent to the Telecommunication Franchise fees paid by AFN to the City for the first five years of operation. From 2000 through Jan 31, 2005, AFN paid a total of $184,897 in Franchise fees for Telecommunication Services of which $103,736 were for Cable Modems. This is in addition to the $167,271 paid in cable TV Franchise fees. These Telecommunication franchise fees have never been paid by Charter and AFN no longer pays the fee on Cable Modem as of June, 2004 but still pays a 5% fee on Data service sales. Cable Modems fees have been ruled illegal by the FCC and subsequently the decision has been upheld by the courts. It would seem appropriate to arrange a credit to AFN equaling these fees. This could come out of the fund balance of the City's General Fund. This would give us a minimum cash balance of about $844,000 on June 30. Any savings of capital expenditure beyond the projections would add to this amount.
This strategy would give AFN breathing room to work on identifying and developing a low level City Contribution to AFN as per the Council goal of providing a low level investment in AFN to ensure financial stability.
The same model that was used to predict our position on June 30, 2005, is also able to make future year's revenue and expenses. It predicts with a modest 3% rate increase in Cable Modem fees and a 6% increase in CATV fees in January, 2006, that revenue for FY05-06 should be about $2,823,000 and operating expenses should be about $2,556,000. This yields $267,000 to go toward debt service, combined with cash of 844,000, provides $1,111,000 to pay the total of $1,234,000 (including the $802,221) that year. That leaves a $127,000 cash short fall at June 30, 2006, with no set aside for July, 2006, debt service of $432,000. The model indicates that a $400,000 -$ 425,000 subsidy per year will be needed starting in FY 05-06. Third Quarter results and preparation of the AFN budget for FY 05-06 will allow staff to refine this number and provide better certainty with respect to the actual amount needed.
Staff has identified a number of potential ways to provide these resources. Listed below are some of those possibilities.
| 1) |
Provide for a General Fund subsidy to AFN recognizing the impact of having AFN in the community and the benefit received by citizens. |
| 2) |
Allocate a portion of the Transient Occupancy Tax not dedicated to tourism promotion to AFN recognizing AFN's contribution to Economic Development. |
| 3) |
Utilize a portion of proceeds from the sale of City fixed assets or property such as the Imperatrice Property and use it to subsidize AFN. |
The total of all of these sources would need to be about in the $400,000- $425,000 per year range until such time as other AFN activities or changes are implemented to better match revenues with requirements. Such subsidies could be viewed as paying for equipment upgrades or retiring city debt. If the projected conservative scenarios are exceeded, the subsidy could be reduced or debt service accelerated.
Revenue enhancement can also displace all or a portion of the size of any AFN subsidy. For example an AFN increase in 500 CATV customers, 550 Cable Modem customers, 10 Data Customers, and 12 Point to Point Customers would generate the following amounts of additional revenue:
| 1) |
500 |
CATV Customers |
--- |
$63,000 |
| 2) |
550 |
CM Customers |
--- |
$174,000 |
| 3) |
10 |
Data Customers |
--- |
$78,000 |
| 4) |
12 |
Point to Point Cust. |
--- |
$43,000 |
|
Total |
|
|
$358,000 |
While we aren't suggesting this as a likely scenario you should be aware that our efforts to continue to improve revenue by attracting more customers will still be the primary focus of everyone at the City involved with AFN's marketing and operations. |