City of Ashland - Home
Home Mayor & Council Departments Commissions & Committees Contact


 
LINE

 
LINE
 
LINE
 
LINE
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
*
*
 
LINE
 
LINE
 
LINE
 
LINE

Notify me by Email
 

City of Ashland, Oregon / City Recorder / City Council Information / Packet Archives / Year 2002 / 03/19 / Elec Rate Design

Elec Rate Design

Council Communication
Title: Electric Rate Design Discussion
Dept: Electric & Telecommunication
Date: March 19, 2002
Submitted By: Dick Wanderscheid, Lee Tuneberg
Reviewed By: Greg Scoles, City Administrator

Synopsis: In October, 2001, staff updated the Council on electric rates and committed to discuss electric rate design in March 2002. The City rate model has been utilized to analyze our current rate classes under the new BPA rate schedules to determine if major rate redesign is needed. This analysis determined only a minor adjustment to commercial rates is warranted.
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the commercial rates be changed from declining block to flat or inclining block rates effective July 1, 2002.
Fiscal Impact: The fiscal impact on the City should be minimal since the revised rates will be designed as revenue neutral as practical.
Background: On October 16, staff informed the council that an additional rate increase beyond July 2001, would not be necessary. Staff did indicate that it would be appropriate to apply the new BPA wholesale rates to the City's rate model to determine if a rate redesign was needed. This work has been completed by using the R. W. Beck rate model. When the rate model was developed in 1998, the process resulted in some major changes to rates which ensure that the various customer classes were each paying their appropriate share of costs and also that certain classes were not cross subsidizing other rate classes. It is important to note that rate design is partially art and partially science, as a number of estimates go into developing modeling assumptions. However, the City's model does give as accurate information as possible. The analysis and subsequent rate redesign that was accomplished in 1998 generally achieved the goal of eliminating subsidizes between customers classes.

Because BPA has made major changes to their wholesale billing process since 1998, staff felt that the analysis needed to be run again to see if new inequities were created by BPA's new rates. Fortunately, the model runs with the new data did not suggest that any major rate redesign was needed. Therefore with one exception, staff would propose that the existing rate structure remain intact.

The proposed change would be to the rates charged to commercial customers. The current rate structure is a declining block structure. This means the price of energy (kWh's) declines as usage increases. The current winter energy charge for single-phase commercial customers is:

First 3,000 kWh's ......$.05687/kWh
Next 17,000 kWh's ......$.04074/kWh
Balance of kWh's ......$.03819/kWh

This type or rate structure is contrary to the conservation ethic the City encourages and goes counter to the remainder of City rates classes which are increasing block rates where kWh's in the last block are more costly than the initial blocks.

The new rate would be redesigned so that it is revenue neutral for the class of commercial customers as a whole, which means that the overall collections from the class would remain the same as before the redesign. This change is needed because it is the only class that has declining blocks. This change would also give the right pricing signal to customers and encourage them to pursue energy efficiency. As part of the proposed budget, staff is proposing a rate increase on July 1. Because final numbers from BPA concerning the amount of the Cost Recover Adjustment Clause (CRAC) aren't available yet, the magnitude of this increase is not known.

End of Document - Back to Top




 

printer friendly version Printer friendly version

If you have questions regarding the site, please contact the webmaster.
Terms of Use | Built using Project A's Site-in-a-Box ©2012

View Mobile Site

News Calendar Agendas NewsCalendarAgendasFacebook Twitter