City of Ashland, Oregon / City Recorder / City Council Information / Packet Archives / Year 2005 / 01/18 / Saladoff Findings / Findings
Findings
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
FOR THE CITY OF ASHLAND
STATE OF OREGON
December 7th, 2004
IN THE MATTER OF PLANNING ACTION #2004-110, REQUEST FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A NEW RESIDENCE 9.47 PERCENT IN EXCESS
OF THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED FLOOR AREA ESTABLISHED BY CITY ORDINANCE ON THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 150 CHURCH STREET.
APPLICANT: Robert M. Saladoff |
)
)
)
)
)
) |
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDERS |
RECITALS:
| 1) |
Tax lot 3901 of 39 1E 08AD is located at 150 Church Street
and is zoned R-1-7.5, Single Family Residential. |
| - |
|
|
|
| 2) |
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct
a new residence 9.47 percent in excess of the maximum permitted floor area
for dwellings within a Historic District established by City Ordinance
18.20.040.G. |
| - |
|
|
|
| 3) |
The criteria for a Conditional Use Permit are described in
Chapter 18.104 and are as follows: |
|
A. |
That the use would be in conformance with all standards
within the zoning district in which the use is proposed to be located, and
in conformance with relevant Comprehensive plan policies that are not implemented
by any City, State, or Federal law or program. |
|
B. |
That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer,
paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage,
and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject
property. |
|
C. |
That the conditional use will have no greater adverse material
effect on the livability of the impact area when compared to the development
of the subject lot with the target use of the zone. When evaluating the effect
of the proposed use on the impact area, the following factors of livability
of the impact area shall be considered in relation to the target use of the
zone: |
|
|
1) |
Similarity in scale, bulk, and coverage. |
|
|
2) |
Generation of traffic and effects on surrounding streets. Increases
in pedestrian, bicycle, and mass transit use are considered beneficial regardless
of capacity of facilities. |
|
|
3) |
Architectural compatibility with the impact area. |
|
|
4) |
Air quality, including the generation of dust, odors, or other
environmental pollutants. |
|
|
5) |
Generation of noise, light, and glare. |
|
|
6) |
The development of adjacent properties as envisioned in the Comprehensive
Plan. |
|
|
7) |
Other factors found to be relevant by the Hearing Authority for review
of the proposed use. |
| - |
|
|
|
| 2) |
The Planning Commission Hearings Board, following proper public
notice, held a public hearing on October 12, 2004 at which time, after receiving
all testimony and exhibits, approved the application subject to conditions
pertaining to the appropriate development of the site. |
| - |
|
|
|
| 3) |
A timely appeal was filed by several neighborhood residents
who had participated in the previous hearing process, either orally or in
writing. |
| - |
|
|
|
| 4) |
The Council, following proper public notice, held a Public
Hearing on December 7th, 2004 at which time testimony was received and exhibits
were presented. The record made before the Hearings Board was received and
is made a part of the record for this proceeding. The Council approved the
application subject to conditions pertaining to the appropriate development
of the site. |
Now, therefore, the Council of the City of Ashland finds, concludes and concludes
as follows:
SECTION 1. EXHIBITS
| -- |
For the purposes of reference to these Findings, the attached index of
exhibits, data, and testimony will be used. |
|
Staff Exhibits lettered with an "S" |
|
Proponent's Exhibits, lettered with a "P" |
|
Opponent's Exhibits, lettered with an "O" |
|
Hearing Minutes, Notices, Miscellaneous Exhibits lettered with an "M" |
SECTION 2. CONCLUSORY FINDINGS
|
2.1 |
The City Council finds that it has received all information necessary
to make a decision based on the Application, Staff Report, public hearing
testimony and the exhibits received. |
|
2.2 |
The City Council finds that the proposal to construct a 3,557 square
foot dwelling, 9.47 percent in excess of the maximum permitted floor area,
complies with the Conditional Use Permit criteria in Chapter 18.104.
Specifically, the City Council finds that the proposed home is compatible
in terms of bulk and scale with the surrounding neighborhood. The design
reduces the mass of the structure presented to the street using features
including a low-sloped roof, a front yard setback in line with the existing
adjacent Victorian to the west, multiple building offsets and bump-outs
responding to site conditions and providing texture to the building envelope,
a covered porch, a bay window, and large roof overhangs. The single story
rear volume steps down to minimize the mass at the street allowing the front
volume of 2,157 square feet to be the primary structural appearance on Church
Street. |
|
2.3 |
The City Council finds that all public facilities such as sewer, water,
electric, storm drainage and fire protection are available or will be installed
as per the conditions listed below to serve the site and proposal. |
|
2.4 |
The Council finds that the proposed home, while only being 9.47% larger
than the outright allowed square footage, will not have greater adverse material
effect on the livability of the impact area in terms of the issues raised
during the hearing than a single family home of an outright permitted size
on the same property. |
SECTION 3. DECISION
|
3.1 |
Based on the foregoing findings of facts, conclusions of law
and evidence contained in the whole record, the Council finds and concludes
that the application for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a single-family
residence which exceeds the Maximum Permitted Floor Area by 9.47 percent
has satisfied all relative substantive standards and criteria contained within
the Ashland Municipal Code and the Ashland Site Design and Use Standards.
The Council ultimately concludes, based upon the foregoing and following
conditions, that planning application 2004-110 complies with all requirements
of the City of Ashland. Therefore, the City Council upholds the decision
of the Ashland Planning Commission Hearings Board and approves Planning Action
2004-110 and imposes the following conditions. |
|
|
1. |
That all proposals of the applicant be conditions of approval unless
otherwise modified here. |
|
|
2. |
That street trees, 1 per 30 feet of street frontage, shall be installed
in the parkrow prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. All street
trees shall be chosen from the adopted Street Tree List and shall be installed
in accordance with the specifications noted in Section E of the Site Design
and Use Standards. The street trees shall be irrigated. |
|
|
3. |
That all conditions of the Fire Department shall be met, including but
not limited to the requirement to provide an alternative (hydrant, sprinklers,
etc.) for review and approval by the Fire Department if fire flows are inadequate
for the size of the structure. |
|
|
4. |
That the Tree Commission shall examine and endorse that the foundation
and east side grading design will not endanger the survival of the California
Black Oak tree, near the property line between 150 Church Street and 142
Church Street (approximately 45 feet from Church Street). If the Tree Commission
cannot so endorse, it shall, within bounds of technical and financial
reasonableness, recommend protective design provisions which the applicant
shall incorporate before building permit approval. |
|
|
5. |
That the applicant agrees to relocate the east side exterior basement
entrance eight feet farther north, relative to the design originally submitted
for review, to bring the construction trenching and stairwell safely beyond
the tree dripline. |
|
|
6. |
That the approved tree conservation plan during construction shall
specifically include protection for the California Black Oak tree, near the
property line between 150 Church Street and 142 Church Street (approximately
45 feet from Church Street), whose trunk is on the neighboring property. |
CITY OF ASHLAND, OREGON
By: John W. Morrison, Mayor
Date :
|