City of Ashland, Oregon / City Recorder / City Council Information / Packet Archives / Year 2004 / 08/17 / Affd. Housing/Garages
Affd. Housing/Garages
[Council Communication]
[Attachments]
Council Communication
| Title: |
Discussion of Request for Proposals for the development
of affordable housing above downtown City owned public parking lots. |
| Dept: |
Planning Department |
| Date: |
August 17, 2004 |
| Submitted By: |
Brandon Goldman, Housing Program Specialist
John McLaughlin, Director of Community Development |
| Approved By: |
Gino Grimaldi, City Administrator |
| Synopsis: |
Last October, the Housing Commission was directed by the
City Council to review a specific proposal for development of affordable
housing above the Hargadine Parking Structure. The Housing Commission reviewed
the proposal presented by Alan Sandler to develop 20 low-income rental units
above the parking structure at their November 19th 2003 meeting. Through
discussions at this and subsequent meetings, the Housing Commission determined
that in lieu of accepting Mr. Sandler's proposal alone, other proposals should
be solicited through an RFP process. Due to complications related to the
maximum building size ordinance for downtown, Mr. Sandler proposed changing
his housing proposal to the Pioneer parking lot (corner of Lithia Way and
Pioneer).
The Housing Commission found that the concept of developing housing above
public parking lots has merit, and was supportive of the potential development
of affordable housing above the Pioneer Lot, and other lots within the downtown
area, such as the small lot on Lithia Way across from Copeland Lumber, and
the lot on Second Street near the Monet restaurant.
For consideration by the Council, the Commission suggests that the City should
include in an RFP a period of affordability of not less than 40 years under
lease, and perhaps contain a buy-back provision at the conclusion of the
period of affordability. Additionally the Housing Commission recommends that
the proposals should benefit households earning less than 80% of median income.
The City's Housing Action Plan identifies downtown parking lots as potential
sites for affordable housing projects, utilizing the airspace over the lots.
For consideration by the Council staff has identified three city owned properties
that could be potential sites for affordable housing above the public parking
lots. These sites include the Lithia Way lot, the Pioneer Street Lot, and
the Second Street lot. The Lithia Way lot has a potential of approximately
10 units, the Pioneer Street Lot (due to being outside of the Downtown overlay)
has a potential of approximately 17 units, and the Second Street lot has
a potential of 13 units. Due to size restrictions on the parking structure,
it may not be possible under the current ordinances to add housing to the
top of this building. |
| Recommendation: |
Staff recommends that the Council direct staff to finalize
the RFP based upon comments received at the meeting, and distribute it for
only the Lithia Way parking lot at this time (approx. 10 units). This will
allow the staff an opportunity to concentrate the efforts on one parcel within
the downtown and work closely with the ultimate housing provider.
Should the process prove successful, other lots can then utilize the same
process.
The Council may also choose to maintain the public parking lots in their
current state and not entertain any requests for further development at these
locations at this time. However, this would tend to run counter to the Housing
Action plan and previous direction from the Council.
The Council may wish to also consider land use amendments which could allow
for housing to be developed over the parking structure, and a greater number
of units over the Pioneer parking lot. |
| Fiscal Impact: |
Dependent upon the Council's direction, sale or lease of
the air space could result in revenue to the City. However, the value of
the airspace has not been determined for any of the three identified sites.
The City may be requested to provide the air space at a low cost, or no cost,
to ensure the viability of an affordable housing project. |
| Background: |
Assuming the Council directs staff to move forward with the RFP, the
following represents the next steps in the process:
| 1. |
Finalize revisions to RFP based upon Council input from 8/17 meeting,
with review by the City Administrator and City Attorney. (approximately 30-60
days) Early October, 2004 |
| 2. |
Distribute RFP to housing developers and non-profit housing providers.
(45 - 60 days) Early December, 2004 |
| 3. |
Staff Review and Recommendation (14 days) Late December,
2004 |
| 4. |
Housing Commission Review and Recommendation (30 days) Late January,
2005 |
| 5. |
Council Review and Decision - February, 2005 |
|
| Attachments: |
A draft RFP has been developed to illustrate how proposals
could be evaluated. This draft RFP contains site specific information and
maps that describe each of the sites identified including their development
potential. It should be recognized that this document is still in draft form
and is subject to further review by the staff based upon comments received
at the meeting.
Draft
RFP |
End of Document - Back to Top
|