City of Ashland, Oregon / City Recorder / City Council Information / Packet Archives / Year 2004 / 06/01 / PA 2004-02
PA 2004-02
[Council Communication]
[Attachments]
Council Communication
| Title: |
Continued Hearing on the Appeal of Planning Action 2004-002,
a request for Site Review and Tree Removal Permit to construct a multi-floor,
8,325 sq. ft. mixed use building at 88 North Main Street. A Physical and
Environmental Constraints Review Permit is requested to permit "development"
within the Ashland Floodplain Corridor.
Applicant: Lloyd Haines |
| Dept: |
Planning Department |
| Date: |
June 1, 2004 |
| Submitted By: |
John McLaughlin, Director of Community Development |
| Approved By: |
Gino Grimaldi, City Administrator
|
| Synopsis: |
On May 18, 2004, the City Council opened the public hearing
on this planning action, and heard from the Staff, applicant and applicant's
representatives, members of the public in favor of the application, and the
appellant. The hearing is still open to allow testimony from members of the
public in opposition to the application, additional comments from Staff,
and applicant rebuttal.
Since the end of the previous meeting, the appellant, Randall A. Hopkins,
has submitted a 21-page supplemental brief to support his appeal of the action.
The applicant's representatives have submitted eight pages of information
to support their oral rebuttal which will be delivered at the end of the
public testimony portion of the hearing.
Staff has presented a three-page memo with three pages of maps to clarify
floodplain corridor issues, and to respond to other issues raised during
the previous public testimony. |
| Recommendation: |
After review of the newly submitted information, and review
of the testimony and exhibits presented at the previous hearing, Staff still
supports the decision of the Planning Commission and recommends the Council
approve the request with the attached conditions as stated in the findings
on pages 71-78 of the record. The Council may wish to attach other conditions
that they deem relevant to the criteria for approval. |
| Attachments: |
•
The
supplemental packet information is attached.
•
Exhibits submitted
at June 1st Council Meeting |
End of Document - Back to Top
|
