City of Ashland, Oregon / City Recorder / City Council Information / Packet Archives / Year 2004 / 05/04 / Armory
Armory
[Council Communication]
[Attachments]
Council Communication
| Title: |
Reconsideration of Armory Conditional Use Permit; Oregon
Military Department, PA #2003-105 |
| Dept: |
Legal Department |
| Date: |
May 4, 2004 |
| Submitted By: |
Paul Nolte |
| Approved By: |
Gino Grimaldi, City Administrator |
| Synopsis: |
Adoption of the attached revised findings would impose different
conditions on the Oregon Military Department (OMD) in the operation of
non-military activities at the National Guard Armory located on East Main
Street. Those changes are more specifically set forth in the attached findings
but basically consist of permitting more low impact gatherings as outright
permitted uses on the property such as "weight-watchers meetings, gymnastics
practices or events, holiday meals, private weddings, birthday parties and
anniversaries (and) non-profit events" so long as there is no live music
or alcohol served.
Commercial uses, with some redefinition, remain subject to the conditions
originally imposed by the council. This matter was appealed to the Land Use
Board of Appeals (LUBA) by OMD and two persons intervened in support of the
city (see below). OMD, the intervenors and city staff have all agreed that
the revised findings are acceptable. |
| Recommendation: |
Adopt the revised findings. |
| Fiscal Impact: |
If the case is resolved at this level, many hours of staff
time in preparing a brief and arguing the case before LUBA will be saved.
Since the case is not significantly complex, the amount of savings would
range in the neighborhood of $2,000 to $4,000. |
| Background: |
Council approved a conditional use permit in November 2003 which was
requested by the Oregon Military Department for the National Guard Armory
located on East Main Street. The permit approval came to the council on appeal
by the OMD from the planning commission. OMD appealed to the council seeking
a change in certain conditions imposed by the planning commission. Written
findings supporting the decision were adopted by the council on December
2, 2003.
OMD then appealed the decision to the LUBA on December 23, 2003. Two parties
intervened in the LUBA appeal, both in support of the City, Sidney C. Abrahams
and Susan P. Rust. At the request of OMD, the intervenors and city staff
met with OMD to see if the issues could be resolved short of filing briefs
and arguing the matter before LUBA. Negotiations between the OMD and city
staff and the intervenors resulted in revised findings to be submitted to
the council for adoption. |
| Attachments: |
|
End of Document - Back to Top
|