City of Ashland, Oregon / City Recorder / City Council Information / Packet Archives / Year 2003 / 03/04 / RVMPO
RVMPO
[Council Communication]
[Attachments]
Council Communication
| Title: |
Approval of Recommended Changes to Bylaws for the
Rogue Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization (RVMPO) Boundary
Expansion |
| Dept: |
Public Works Department |
| Date: |
March 4, 2003 |
| Submitted By: |
Paula Brown |
Approved
By:
........................... |
Gino Grimaldi, City Administrator |
| Synopsis: |
At the November 6, 2002 study session, Council received
a presentation on the Rogue Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization (RVMPO)
from the Rogue Valley Council of Governments as the designated support arm
for the RVMPO. Since then, there have been several RVMPO meetings and a combined
MPO "Summit" to discuss and resolve issues involving current and potential
new members of this required merger. The primary concerns stemmed around
voting rights, voting structure and funding decisions, and the MPO Summit
produced recommended changes to the current bylaws. Once approved by the
existing and new MPO jurisdictions, the MPO Policy Committee intends to discuss
and hopefully approve these changes to the bylaws at their March 25, 2003
meeting. |
| Recommendation: |
It is recommended that Council review and approve
the attached recommended changes to the bylaws that would:
-
Amend the bylaws to incorporate new members as voting members of the
MPO; and
-
Amend the bylaws to change the current voting system to require a
"super majority" vote (two thirds plus one) if consensus cannot be reached
on an MPO decision item/issue.
|
| Fiscal Impact: |
There are two levels of fiscal impact. The first
is the "Discretionary" STP (Surface Transportation Program) Funds. The State
splits its federally allocated STP funds with all MPOs and cities with
populations over 5,000. For the past several years, Ashland has been eligible
for over $100,000 a year in STP funds. Typically Council would authorize
a fund exchange for these funds so that the dollars could go to a variety
of City street projects.
In the past these funds came directly to the City of Ashland to fund
eligible projects (such as Sherman and Union Streets, and recently the Water
Street Bridge). Now, as a part of a larger MPO, Ashland would compete internally
for these funds. The MPO's current STP Funding Policy states that "...the
STP dollars will be rotated through the MPO jurisdictions as appropriate..."
This policy statement does not seem to be well defined and perhaps
there should be specific criteria developed for worthy projects. Perhaps
the State or FHWA has guidelines for the distribution of these funds and
a standard set of criteria for project funding. Rotating project dollars
does not provide a strong sense of project merit. Staff understands that
the MPO has already allocated the next 6-10 years worth of STP dollars. If
this were the case, then it would seem appropriate to allocate individual
amounts to new cities joining the MPO for the same amount of time. In any
event, STP allocations and funding levels for the new members' needs to be
reviewed for better understanding and clarification.
In addition, the MPO allocates 50% of its discretionary STP funds
to the Rogue Valley Transit District. The total amount of discretionary funds
has been $615,000 a year with half going to RVTD. Ashland pays RVTD $200,000
a year plus an additional $35,000-40,000 for the free ridership program.
This will need to be discussed further as Ashland becomes a part of the
MPO.
In addition to the STP funds, the City of Ashland will be required
to pay MPO membership dues to RVCOG. Currently the RVCOG charges membership
dues dependent upon population. The 2001-02 dues were a total of $19,261
with Medford paying $8,465 and Jackson County paying $3,265. The remaining
dues were split between RVTD, Central Point and Phoenix. It is anticipated
that the City of Ashland would pay a similar amount as the County for the
annual MPO membership service dues to the RVCOG. RVCOG is responsible to
provide transportation planning, transportation project planning and
implementation, transportation modeling with ODOT, public involvement and
air quality conformity determination. |
| Background: |
The 2000 census codified and subsequently redefined
urban areas. As such, the existing "Medford" urbanized area grew and now
extends to Ashland and Jacksonville. Our expanded urbanized area has grown
to be 128,780 in population (2000 census figures). Based upon federal
regulations, the new designation requires that the current Rogue Valley
Metropolitan Planning Organization (RVMPO) expand it's boundaries to cover
the entire area that is anticipated to become urbanized within the next 20
years. This allows transportation planning to be accomplished in total, and
includes the air quality determinations for our area. It is the MPO's policy
to develop continuing, cooperative and comprehensive transportation planning
processes that consider all transportation modes that support the regional
system. Formal designation of the revised boundaries and new MPO boundaries
is recommended by the MPO Policy Committee, approved by the Governor then
accepted by the Federal Highway Association (FHWA) and the Federal Transit
Authority (FTA). By law we are required to have the boundary expanded by
April 25, 2005. However funding decisions require us to participate
sooner.
The expansion of the MPO boundaries has been anticipated for the past
several years. Even so, there are still many unknowns as the organization
changes. The primary concerns stem from dollars and equality, which are very
"normal" under the circumstances. Each agency will need to process the changes
and feel comfortable that their individual needs are taken into account as
these policies are rewritten.
A map of the proposed boundary expansion and the recommended changes
to the bylaws are attached. |
Attachments (memo and maps) are available in PDf format. Please click
on the link below to view these documents on your computer:
 | |
 |
The above document(s) are Adobe® Acrobat® PDF files and may be viewed using the free Adobe® Acrobat® Reader™. Most newer web browsers already contain the Adobe® Acrobat® Reader™ plug-in. However, if you need it, click on the "Get Acrobat® Reader™" icon to download it now.
|
|